2026

MEA CULPA MEA
CULPA

I CONFESS MY GUILT

The year 2025 is over.
Welcome to 2026.

Let me first tell you that I am or was a customer of, well, who is it?
Is it Cellnex? Is it Alticom? Broadcast Partners? ON Tower Netherlands 3 B.V.?
Or is it the lawyer of Broadcast Partners, now On Towers Netherlands 3 B.V., who is convinced that he owns everything. We shall see!

Did you know, by the way, that Broadcast Partners’ predecessor was NOZEMA and that we were friends with them? They helped us (my predecessor) to place the antennas in the mast between their antennas because they were already paying for the space anyway. The major broadcasting station had to be taken off the air at two o’clock in the morning from Hilversum, after which the antennas were partially disconnected and the transmitters could be restarted after a few minutes. Immediately after our joint efforts, the ritual took place again. Yes, Mr. Lawyer, these were your direct colleagues. My old colleagues from KPN and from the pirate radio days in Amsterdam.
And so the world around you is getting smaller and smaller. Not that you need to worry about that, because I am not like you.

And did you also know that several tube masts on top of the towers are owned by NOVEC, an organisation that is not to blame in any way, and which also happens to be made up of former colleagues of mine?

Right, I am or was a customer. As long as the court does not decide otherwise, I remain a customer. So I am not writing on behalf of any of the above-mentioned organisations. I did work for the predecessor of these companies and the predecessor before that, but this was only for a short time, just 28 years.
After that, I had full access to all towers in the Netherlands for another seven years, and from 2014 onwards, this was limited to a single tower in Lelystad and, as a bonus discount, a second tower. I entered into an agreement with Alticom. This was supposed to be better than the policy of tolerance that had been in place for many years prior to 2014. I (we) were told that this would give us more certainty. Unfortunately, I am not allowed to reveal everything here, but you can take my word for it that I can substantiate every statement with evidence.
Apart from the Lelystad tower, there is apparently one more, but I am not going to tell you which one it is. Why? Because the parties mentioned above would also like to know. Even though it is actually very clear. After all, you regularly tell me that this is the case. It’s just a matter of reading it first. It is now 2026, so all in all, I have been walking around in the towers in the Netherlands for over 46 years.
One thing is certain: I will not bother you for another 46 years. After all, I would then be 110 years old and therefore already dead.

Once upon a time, and this is not a fairy tale, someone initiated summary proceedings against me. He was a door-to-door salesman who cheated and swindled all his customers. All of this person’s customers (somewhere between 10,000 and 15,000) had to pay this man FL 300 through a debt collection agency. I advised all of these customers who contacted me via a website to pursue legal action, in which I would assist these victims free of charge. (as an ordinary citizen) The only legal action that was taken was summary proceedings against me personally. Yes, I couldn’t win these summary proceedings either. But all these people I helped never had to pay a penny.
I was stuck with a penalty payment. But this did not stop me from continuing.
Shortly afterwards, the penalty lapsed and the brothers asked me to remove the comments from the site. In fact, they asked me to remove the entire site. I did remove the text. After all, it said: so, the first one is dead, two more to go.
This concerned three brothers with different companies who were not behaving properly. And for me, the problem of the claimant had spontaneously disappeared. Incidentally, the websites still exist after more than 20 years.
Why? Because I know what I am doing and always speak the truth.

Now you also know WHY I have the nickname
PITBULL

Received

WHY?

In November 2022, Alticom and/or Cellnex attempted to terminate this agreement without giving any reason. The agreement was terminated spontaneously. You could almost say, ‘A DAY IN THE LIFE YOU WILL NEVER FORGET’.

Fortunately, I did not experience this day. What was noticeable, however, was that our equipment had been disrupted for some time. A radio signal coming from the tower itself was the source of the interference. A source of interference that spontaneously disappeared the moment I made an appointment to visit the tower. In itself, of course, very strange. From November 2022 onwards, Cellnex/Alticom made access very difficult. In hindsight (February 2024), I was told that independent access is denied from the day an agreement is terminated (a notice that the agreement is being dissolved). ‘A YEAR OF YOUR LIFE YOU WILL NEVER FORGET’ Sorry, a little longer.

How did I know that the interference signal was coming from the tower and not from somewhere else?
Let’s take a quick look at my previous employer’s car.

This was a temporary setup that did not allow for a fellow passenger.
Later, the equipment was moved to the boot of this bus and connected to the screen on the dashboard and the controls between the seats by means of five fibre optic cables. The plasma screen shows what signals are present in the airwaves. So it wasn’t that difficult for me. This equipment was already installed in the vehicles of the Radio Control Service in the 1980s. Oh, how I used to curse it. On the other hand, it wasn’t that difficult to find out where my forbidden transmitter was located at the time. The right-hand side of the screen is a spectrum analyser with the large central peak of Radio Veronica at 103 MHz from the Lelystad tower. On the passenger seat is a computer with a 386 processor and above it an Icom R9000 receiver and the controls in front of it. Later, a Doppler pillar was added, which neatly indicated the direction from which the signal was coming. I currently still have three of these sets in my possession.

WHY?

November 2022.

A letter (termination notice) was sent to an address where I had not lived for a long time. I therefore never received this letter (termination notice).
The solicitor tells the court that I probably did not inform them that I no longer lived there and that it may be my fault. Let’s look back to 2015, (7 years) before the termination notice was sent by Cellnex/Alticom to the address Weidebocht 6 in Heerde. Not by registered post, nor by email. Cellnex/Alticom can therefore be used very effectively to turn a doughnut into a currant bun.
But they want to charge almost 7,000 times as much rent from one amateur radio operator in Lelystad. The rest of the Netherlands can continue at the old price. They don’t know what equality before the law means. And when you have nowhere else to turn, you feel that you are being treated UNFAIRLY and you say something about it, they call it UNPROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOUR and no longer want you as a tenant.
This is, of course, complete nonsense. I only defended myself when they made it clear that they no longer wanted me as a tenant. Why? They don’t want to answer that question.

If you read my full story, you can judge for yourself who has not acted professionally. Okay, it was about a change of address that I allegedly didn’t report.

24 December 2015, 14:17

Below you will find my old and new address details.
Old address: Weidebocht 6 8181 EH Heerde

New address: De Wetstraat 88 8172 CL Vaassen
I wish you happy holidays and a healthy 2016.

Kind regards,
Chris Koeree The text was slightly longer but not important.

24 December 2015 14:25

Dear Mr Koeree,

Thank you for the change of address.
As you can see on the invoice, we sent it to the old address.
Next year, we will use the address details you provided.

If you have any questions regarding this email, please let me know. Otherwise:

Kind regards / vriendelijke groet,

Back then, love was still very common. A polite response from the real Alticom at the time, and within eight minutes no less. Where have those good old days gone?

In the meantime, a few address changes have been reported, but I will include these in the legal proceedings. This seems sufficient for now.

A cancellation that never reached me because Cellnex/Alticom is unable to store customer data in a simple database and keep it up to date. It is therefore not inconceivable that several documents were sent to me to which I may never have responded because they were sent to the wrong address. What about my privacy?
After all, these matters are none of the business of the new residents, or perhaps an ex of mine. Okay, then don’t complain about these 14 review sites.

On 16 January 2024, I received a copy of the cancellation letter dated 29 November 2022 for the first time.

From: ***@cellnextelecom.nl>

To: Chris Koeree.

WHY?

But what about

MEA CULPA MEA CULPA

I CONFESS MY GUILT

I am a sensitive and emotional person. And if I do something that doesn’t sit well with me, I have to resolve it as quickly as possible. And sometimes, you just have to bare all!

The same applies in this situation. But sometimes it is better to wait a few days before admitting your guilt. Oh yes, sorry, but nobody wants to see my bare bottom. Hence this photo of a Pitbull. Of course, there is something behind the term Pitbull. It is a nickname that I have been given several times by friends and acquaintances. My enemies will not readily admit this, but the confrontation is all the worse for it. Winning or losing is not important to me. I have lost two summary proceedings against Alticom/Cellnex.
But did I really lose them? Or did Cellnex/Alticom lose them?
It just depends on where you place the emphasis. In any case, Alticom/Cellnex has already lost the goal of terminating the agreement three times.

WHY?

PITBULL

There is a certain similarity between a Pitbull and me. Everyone who knows me knows that. My first encounter with a Pitbull was at the animal ambulance in Amsterdam, in the Oosterpark. The animal had another dog in its jaws. And when you have to break its jaws open, you immediately know what a Pitbull is. A sweet animal that only suits an owner who knows how to handle it. I wish Cellnex/Alticom also knew how to handle a solicitor. The moral of this story: what a Pitbull grabs, it never lets go. And too bad for Cellnex/Alticom. This is exactly my character.
And let me comfort you, you are not the first and certainly not the last to still be confronted with the truth many years later. If something is wrong in my argument, please let me know, and I will check it and adjust it. If you don’t say anything, then my thoughts and experiences are the true story for me.

On 18 December 2025, I was allowed to enter the Lelystad tower under supervision to remove my installation. My supervisor, a nice man, made a last-minute comment along the lines of “and now the roof is empty”.
I skirted around this with my response. Not that my answer was incorrect, but it was still too early for me to explain what the actual situation was after the work that day.
Now that it is 2026, I am fortunately able to do so.

Dear supervisor, first of all, my apologies for not being open on 18 December 2025. On the other hand, you didn’t want to know anything about the case either.

But here is an honest answer. The roof is still full of antennas; we removed two because I felt that these two antennas (the brackets) no longer looked good, in my opinion.

I also mentioned this in my email dated Friday, 12 December 2025, at 9:36 a.m.:

‘Now it concerns the two antennas, which I find strange that they are tolerated in the condition the brackets are currently in. I dare say that this is unsafe.’ I do not consider the rest of the text important.

On the other side of this mast was another antenna with slightly less rust.
To give you an idea, this antenna was a few metres above the roof, and the roof is 142 metres high. Standing on a ladder, armed with an angle grinder, I stole these antennas with brackets and cabling from the mast under supervision.

I had heard from reliable sources that the solicitor employed by On Tower Netherlands 3 B.V. had sent me a threatening letter (sorry, but as long as I am using a representative, I will only read messages from the solicitor via my representative) threatening that I had to remove these two antennas and the 19″ cabinet with equipment in the attic before 1 January 2026.

If I failed to do so, the solicitor would do it himself or instruct someone else to do it. I believe this is the fifth time that an attempt has been made to send me such a threatening letter. Previously, this was possible. But now that Cellnex has clearly indicated three times that they do not want to talk to me, even through their CEO, I believe the time for talking is over.
Everything I say now is public. So that everyone can see how Cellnex treats its customers. And yes, that means I will also have to bare all from time to time.

Three paragraphs back, the word “stolen” appears. This is not a typo.
These antennas do not belong to me. I am not going to tell you again who they belong to. Find out for yourself! If the owner comes forward, they will remain in my storage for the time being. Am I now a thief? Is my supervisor a thief? No, we were instructed by the solicitor employed by On Tower Netherlands 3 B.V.

And this man dares to tell the court that I am not allowed to enter the tower alone because I could sabotage third-party equipment.

Are you familiar with the saying, “the pot calling the kettle black”?
For the time being, I am the one who definitively established on 18 March 2024 that my equipment was sabotaged twice, and I therefore assume that the interference signal from 2022 and 2023 also came from a deliberately placed jammer in the tower and that this was therefore almost 100% certainly also sabotage.
Who is responsible for this sabotage within the walls of the tower?
Exactly, what a …….. little man this lawyer is. And then to make an accusation in court that I could commit sabotage if I entered the tower on my own. What a …….. little man.

And then to threaten that if I don’t remove my belongings, you will have them removed. You have no right to do that, and if you do, the consequences for you will be incalculable.

I will conclude this piece now in the hope that someone will use their common sense. Please note that the turn of the year has passed, so if you now wish to terminate the agreement again, the termination will only take effect at the end of December 2026. With a notice period of one year, you can only evict me as of 1 January 2028. And every day that you deny me access, the claim for damages continues to accrue.
Unless the court decides otherwise. Do not come up with a story such as Cellnex is not the owner or landlord, or there is no urgent interest because I did not act expeditiously or the permits have expired.
After all, the court will not consider whether or not an agreement exists, no decision will be made, and we will both stick to what suits us best. And yes, as long as you defeat all the lawsuits, I will stick to my position.

In May 2024, I gave you notice of default for the fourth time. At that time, I also filed a claim for damages of €150 per day, excluding statutory interest, which you believe I am not entitled to. I prefer to leave this decision to the court.

On 31 December 2025, the claim for damages had risen to €95,368.31.

As long as the court has not ruled (your own fault), I will remain a tenant of the Lelystad tower and possibly another tower. After all, there is no official termination in effect! And there is certainly no question of termination in January 2023, January 2024, February 2024 or 1 January 2026!

Oh ja, mijn antenne staat nog steeds op de toren Lelystad en is al aardig aan het verkleuren. dus mocht u zich vervelen, dan mag u hem even schoon poetsen.
Oh u weet niet welke antenne het is. Dan doe ik het wel in de loods na verwijdering in 2028.

Tenzij de rechter voor die tijd beslist dat het anders zal zijn. Maar dan zal u zelf ook een keer in actie moeten komen en niet alles aan uw klanten over laten. Maar ja, dat kost geld, net als een postzegel of een aangetekend stuk.

Iets meer dan een tientje, in 2022 zelfs veel minder. Maar dan had u wel meer zekerheid gehad. Dan had u wellicht in uw recht gestaan met de opzegging. Of het netjes is en of u deze aandacht had kunnen voorkomen dat had u dan zelf kunnen bepalen. Of als u met een eerlijk verhaal naar buiten was gekomen dan hadden we daar rustig over kunnen praten. Nu kan ik niet anders dan mij verantwoorden tegenover al deze radiozendamateurs via dit soort review sites.

Hoeveel onjuistheden van uw kant heb ik in dit bericht nu al laten zien? Ik heb er echter nog heel wat op de plank liggen. Allemaal met bewijsstukken. U kunt mij de toegang tot de toren makkelijk weigeren. U kunt een contract/ overeenkomst ontbinden of beëindigen indien u zicOh yes, my antenna is still on the Lelystad tower and is already starting to discolour. So if you’re bored, you can give it a good clean.
Oh, you don’t know which antenna it is. Then I’ll do it in the shed after it’s been removed in 2028.

Unless the court decides otherwise before then. But then you will have to take action yourself and not leave everything to your customers. But yes, that costs money, just like a stamp or a registered letter.

A little more than ten pounds, and in 2022 even less. But then you would have had more certainty. Then you might have been within your rights to terminate the contract. You could have decided for yourself whether it was appropriate and whether you could have prevented this attention. Or if you had come forward with an honest story, we could have discussed it calmly. Now I have no choice but to answer to all these radio amateurs via review sites like this.

How many inaccuracies on your part have I already pointed out in this message? However, I still have a lot more up my sleeve. All with supporting evidence. You can easily deny me access to the tower. You can terminate or cancel a contract/agreement if you comply with the rules.
A battle over a notice period of one month or one year?

It is now 2026 and you started in 2022.

How pathetic!h conformeert aan de regels.
Een strijd over een opzegtermijn van een maand of een jaar?

It is now 2026 and you started in 2022.

How pathetic!